Skip to content

American Fisheries Society Family of Websites:

Fisheries.org

American Fisheries Society
Family of Websites

Journals

Read our five journals and Fisheries magazine

Gray Literature Database

Find thousands of unpublished agency reports and other information

Annual Meeting

Join us in San Antonio in 2025

Divisions, Chapters, Sections

Find an AFS Unit near you or in your area of specialty

Climate Change and Fisheries

Learn how to communicate the effects of climate change on fisheries

Hutton Junior Fisheries Biology Program

Summer internships for high school students

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Fisheries

Explore our initiatives to increase diversity in the Society and in the fisheries profession

Center for Fisheries Technology and Collaboration

Find fisheries science products and services

Center for Technology and Collaboration

Quick answers to common questions

Other Resources
  • Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fish Website

  • Rotenone Stewardship Program Information Site

  • Fishionary: A blog about fish words! 
Latest News
AFS Calls for Habitat Modification to Remain in Definition of Harm in Endangered Species Act Natural Resource Professional Societies Issue Joint Statement on the Impacts of Federal Workforce Reduction Future of Public Trust Resources – Statement of the American Fisheries Society AFS x CWP – ‘Tomorrow’s Catch: Securing our Future Fisheries’   Latest Newsletter
Donate
Login
Logout
$0.00 0 Cart
  • Who We Are

    Who We Are

    Governance

    Learn how AFS is structured

    Divisions, Sections, Chapters

    Find a community in your local
    area or in your expertise

    Committees

    Get engaged and volunteer

    Awards & Recognition

    Nominate your heroes

    Diversity

    Learn more about our DEIJA efforts

    AFS Celebrates 150+ Years

    Explore our history

    AFS Fisheries Partnerships

    Meet our global partners

    Meet the Staff

    Dedicated to serving our members

    Contact Us

    Quick answers to common questions

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    What Are Fisheries?

    Explore fisheries professions

  • MEMBERSHIP

    Membership

    Learn about membership benefits and member types

    Member Directory

    Find your colleagues

    Types of Membership

    For all stages of your career                   

    Give the Gift
    of Membership

    Invest in an aspiring fisheries
    professional’s future

    Who Are Our Members

    From students to 50-year Golden Members

    My Account

    Log in to access member benefits or renew

    Join/Renew

    It’s Quick and Easy

    Organizational Membership

    Become a Strategic Partner!

  • POLICY

    POLICY

    Recovering America’s
    Wildlife Act

    Critical funding for state conservation programs

    Climate Change

    Communicate the impacts
    of climate change on fisheries

    Magnuson-Stevens Act

    Ensuring sustainability of marine fisheries

    Waters of the US

    News about Clean Water Act
    jurisdiction

    Water Quality

    Healthy fisheries
    require healthy waters                    

    Pebble Mine

    Protecting Bristol Bay salmon fisheries

    National Fish
    Habitat Partnership

    Addressing fish habitat regionally

    Infrastructure

    Funding impacts on fish habitat

    Aquaculture

    Providing food security for the future

    Future of the Nation’s
    Aquatic Resources

    Priorities for US fisheries policies

    Sport Fish Restoration Act

    Coming soon

    Recent Policy Statements

    Official policy statements of AFS

    Policy Letters

    Comments on policy,
    legislation, and regulations

    Advocacy Guidelines

    For Units and members

    Science Guidelines

    Practicing science appropriately

    Briefings

    Congressional briefings with our partners

    Resolutions

    Member-approved resolutions
    on policy

  • NEWS

    News

    Announcements

    Official AFS news

    Annual Meeting

    News from the meeting

    Members in the News

    Awards and interviews

    Policy News

    Round-up of all policy news

    Beneath the Surface Podcast

    A deep dive into the programs and people at AFS

    Federal Workforce and Budget Cuts

    Resources and Ways to Take Action

    Newsletter

    Bi-weekly newsletter for members and partners

    Press Releases

    News media releases

  • EVENTS

    Events

    Annual Meeting

    San Antonio 2025

    Future Annual Meetings

    Where we are heading

    Past Annual Meetings

    Where we’ve been

    World Fisheries Congress 2024

    Seattle, Washington

    Other Past Events

    Past special events

    Fisheries Events Calendar

    Events around the world

    Add Your Event Listing

    Submit your calendar item

  • JOBS

    Jobs

    Career Help from AFS

    Compilation of job listing boards

    Other Career Tips

    Career info for members

    Find a Job

    Listings from all over North America

    Post a Job

    Submit your job opening

  • PUBLICATIONS

    Publications

    AFS Journals Program

    More than 150 years of excellence

    AFS Books Program

    Publish with AFS

    Submit Journal Article

    Reach the right audience for your research

    Fisheries Magazine

    Monthly membership magazine

    Writing Tools

    Guides for authors and other resources

    Fishy Fridays

    Weekly blog highlighting AFS fisheries journal articles

    Bookstore

    Shop more than 180 titles

    Journal Online Access

    Log in to access journal articles

    Gray Literature Database

    Thousands of unpublished agency reports and research

  • Professional Development

    Professional Development

    Continuing Education

    Gain skills and enhance your career

    Professional Certification

    Official recognition of your expertise

    Hutton Junior Fisheries
    Biology Program

    Summer high school
    internship program

    Leadership Opportunities

    Hone your leadership skills, volunteer today!

    Webinars

    Check out upcoming sessions or browse our library

    More Online Resources

    Practical resources for fisheries professionals

  • Engagement

    Engagement

    Strategic Partners

    See how your organization can partner with AFS

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    The 1870 Society

    Recognizing generous individual donors who invest in the Society's mission

    2024 Annual Report

    Find out what AFS did for the fisheries community in 2024

    Shop AFS

    Check out the latest AFS merch here

Login
Logout

Magnuson-Stevens Act

A new marine fisheries policy was approved by the AFS Governing Board Atlantic City in August to inform the proposed Congressional re-authorization and amendment of the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Management Act, the federal law that governs fisheries management in offshore waters. A special committee of prominent marine fisheries experts led by co-chairs, Tom Miller, University of Maryland Fisheries Professor and Director of the Chesapeake Biological Laboratory and Cynthia Jones, Immediate Past President of the Marine Fisheries Section and Professor at Old Dominion University, developed science-based recommendations to inform policy-makers as they seek to revise the law. The committee focused its advice on four key areas: Best Scientific Information Available, Catch Limits and Rebuilding, Habitat and Ecosystems, and Adapting to Environmental Change. See the summary below or download PDFs of the summary and the full report.


American Fisheries Society Scientific Recommendations
on Reauthorization of the Magnuson-Stevens Act

Best Scientific Information Available

  • The American Fisheries Society (AFS) strongly endorses continued reliance on Best Scientific Information Available Standard (BSIA), as a best practice in managing the nation’s fisheries. 
    More
    The success of MSA is based in part of reliance on BSIA in fisheries management. National Standard 2 specifies that “conservation and management measures shall be based upon the best scientific information available.” Under this standard, data must adhere to widely recognized scientific principles to be used in management decisions. AFS views four components of BSIA to be particularly important: (1) all data used in assessments must be collected objectively, (2) data must have a clear statistical foundation, (3) be peer-reviewed, and (4) timely.
  • AFS is concerned that data from self-reported sources (i.e. mobile technologies) are not sufficiently reliable to estimate catch without a valid sampling frame and should not be mandated in legislation. 
    More
    Stakeholder collected data reported via mobile technologies seems ideally suited to efficiently collect large volumes of data over large areas. However, without a saltwater angler registry, the data lacks a sampling frame. The use of this data would introduce substantial bias into the management process.
  • AFS supports the inclusion of citizen science into fisheries management and encourages the development of innovative survey sampling methods to enable collection of reliable and unbiased data from anglers. 
    More
    New technologies could improve timeliness and accuracy of data and eventually reduce costs, but implementation is complex and costly. Additional funding is needed to innovate and develop new data collection, analysis, and management approaches to enable the collection of reliable and unbiased data from recreational anglers. Involvement of stakeholders in setting objectives for management strategy evaluations provides an opportunity for increased involvement in fisheries management.

Catch Limits

  • AFS believes science-based management is the cornerstone of fisheries management and recommends the continued separation of scientific and socioeconomic decision-making. AFS supports the requirement that the Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC) must be less than the Overfishing Limit (OFL). 
    More
    AFS believes science-based management is the cornerstone of fisheries management and recommends the separation of scientific and socioeconomic decision-making that has contributed to declines in overfishing be maintained. The Overfishing Limit-Acceptable Biological Catch-Annual Catch Limit framework prevents overfishing while accounting for both scientific and management uncertainty. The requirement that the ABC must be less than the OFL must be maintained. However, revisions to the MSA should allow for adaptable and responsive management to account for new developments in science and management.
  • AFS supports maintaining the Annual Catch Limit (ACL) requirement for recreational fisheries, but recommends a flexible approach to defining “Optimal Yield” in individual fisheries. 
    More
    The MSA requires annual catch limits (ACLs) that prevent overfishing for all federally-managed fish stocks. Commercial and recreational fishers harvest fish from the same population. Recreational fishing can have a significant impact on abundance from catch and discards. Therefore, exempting recreational fisheries from the catch limit requirement carries a risk of degrading fisheries. AFS encourages the full exploration and pilot testing of alternative approaches to managing recreational fishing. Direct measure of exploitation rates through methods such as mark/recapture studies could be used to effectively estimate fishing mortality rather than using landings data to estimate biomass.  If effective, alternatives approaches such as these can likely be implemented without the need to exempt recreational fisheries from ACLs. A single definition of “Optimal Yield” based on catch in biomass promotes maximum harvest of pounds of fish, which is well-suited for commercial fisheries, but doesn’t always meet the needs of recreational anglers. Concerns over profit or total weight drive commercial fishers while the opportunity to catch fish with the chance that some will likely be large motivates recreational anglers. Councils should have the flexibility to define “Optimal Yield” based on the competing needs of stakeholders in different areas of the country to better balance the needs of individual fisheries.
  • Revisions to the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA) should allow for adaptable and responsive management to account for new developments in science and management.
  • AFS supports increased flexibility in MSA with regard to setting OFLs, ABCs, and ACLs for data-poor stocks. 
    More
    A conventional stock assessment is a data-driven and model-intensive scientific tool to estimate population abundance, fishing mortality, and stock status using information on catch and discards, abundance data collected by state and federal agencies, and biological data on a species. However, more than half of all stocks are considered data-poor. It is very difficult for scientists to determine productivity and set ACLs with any precision with limited catch data or insufficient biological information. AFS supports continued research into alternative approaches that would allow for management using well-known fisheries indicators, spatial controls, and habitat-based approaches to design reasonable and precautionary fishing rates to rebuild stocks without the need to rely on a formal stock assessment.
  • AFS urges innovative approaches to managing mixed-stock fisheries and encourages exploration of emerging technology to better manage for “choke” species. 
    More
    Mixed-stock fisheries are ones that catch and land several stocks of fish using the same gear types in the same general areas. Managing for the least productive stock, i.e., “choke” species, restricts fishing for more robust species that would be caught at the same time when the limit for the rare or less healthy stock is reached. New technologies provide an opportunity to address this challenge by integrating physical data with information on the distributions and preferences of marine species to predict key habitats or productive fishing grounds. Remote sensing and satellite telemetry data can help fishermen avoid non-target or ESA species and can be used to rapidly open and close areas to minimize bycatch. International policy can also help inform future revisions to the MSA. The EU recently banned discarding and requires fishermen to land their entire catch. This allows for more certainty in regards to total catch and provides an incentive to find market-based approaches to yield an economic return on fish that would have otherwise been discarded.

Rebuilding

  • Rebuilding timelines should be based on the biology of the stock and AFS supports adaptability and flexibility in transitioning into and out of a period of overfishing or rebuilding. 
    More
    The requirement to establish rebuilding plans has been an important tool in achieving healthier and more sustainable stocks. Under current law, rebuilding plans force the abundance of individual species to return to a healthy level in a relatively short time, generally 10 years, with some exceptions. Uncertainty in stock projections coupled with the requirement to rebuild in a defined time frame, such as a ten-year rule, can lead to sharp decreases in catch limits when rebuilding is slower than expected and bring undesirable social and economic impacts. The challenges to managing fisheries in a 10-year timeframe will become more pronounced with changes in environmental conditions, natural cycles, and predator-prey relationships brought on by climate change. AFS cautions that flexibility should not lead to delaying action or ignoring scientific advice. Further, when a stock assessment suggests that a stock cannot rebuild in 10 years, increased harvest pressure and additional annual catch should not be allowed as it is incompatible with rebuilding in as short a time as possible.
  • AFS supports the call of the National Research Council to focus on management of exploitation rates in a rebuilding context rather than abundance (biomass). 
    More
    Exploitation rates (fishing mortality) can be estimated more reliably and can be related to the productivity of a particular stock. A slower pace of rebuilding with a constant level of fishing mortality below MSY may be less disruptive and more stable for fishermen than a system that uses increasingly severe controls to meet a set rebuilding schedule. This approach also rebuilds a stock’s age structure rather than the spawning stock biomass and is more resilient to natural variability and environmental conditions.
  • Using harvest control rules that have been simulation tested in a management strategy evaluation to reduce fishing mortality before a species becomes overfished could eliminate the need for rebuilding plans and could reduce the need for accountability measures. 
    More
    Stock assessments are inherently uncertain due to sampling and the natural variation associated with the complex dynamics of ecosystems even when data are abundant. Projections are even more uncertain when abundance is low. Testing harvest control rules in a management strategy evaluation before they are implemented can avoid these sharp changes and alleviate the resulting social and economic impacts. This approach could also lower the risk of exceeding the ABC and reduce the need for accountability measures.

Habitat and Ecosystems

  • AFS recommends continued focus on habitat and Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management as ways of improving stability and value of the nation’s fisheries. 
    More
    Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management is a holistic approach to management in that it provides context when multiple species are exploited at the same time. In essence, it is a tradeoffs exercise that can help managers meet objectives of multiple stakeholders and leads to increased value, less risk, improved stability, and better fisheries. EBFM is useful in managing species that have predator-prey or habitat interrelationships and can be used to account for these interactions. Fisheries managers currently incorporate ecosystem considerations, such as predation mortality on forage fish or thermal effects on growth, into existing biological reference points and harvest control rules. It is also a useful tool to evaluate alternative harvest strategies in mixed-stock fisheries.
  • Clearer policy guidance regarding the objectives of EBFM is necessary for it to be more widely used. 
    More
    Many, if not all, marine resource management institutions have adopted some form of ecosystem based management. Continued progress requires development and implementation of fishery management plans, and the recognition that setting EBFM objectives is both a scientific and socio-economic process. Stakeholders and managers must be able to agree on objectives for science to inform which management options are best suited to achieve objectives. Until this is achieved, successful implementation of EBFM will be limited.

Adapting to Environmental Change

  • Precautionary catch limits and realistic rebuilding timeframes will be necessary to account for uncertainty and change in the climate and ecosystem. 
    More
    Changes in the ocean environment, including warming and acidification, are altering ecosystems, changing stock productivities, and causing widespread shifts in the distribution of many exploited species. These changes were not contemplated in previous versions of MSA and should be considered in future revisions of the MSA. Changing conditions should not be viewed as an opportunity to relax management standards.
  • Future re-authorizations should focus on adaptability and flexibility to reflect the fact that fisheries productivity is changing. 
    More
    Some approaches that are commonly used to achieve fishery management goals—including spatial closures, spawning closures, and season opening dates—may be less effective due to changing spatial and temporal shifts of species they are designed to protect. Evaluating the outcomes of different fishery management options applied under climate change scenarios will be important for achieving optimal yield over the long term as required in MSA.
  • Resources must be directed to monitor and evaluate the effects of climate-related factors on population structure and biological rates and resulting information should be incorporated into stock assessments and scientific advice. 
    More
    Studies have demonstrated the value of fisheries management measures that preserve stock size and age structure, protect reproductive females and spawning congregations, and maintain abundance for enhancing the resilience of fish and invertebrate populations to climate impacts. Shifts in productivity, distribution, vital rates and predator-prey and trophic relationships should be documented so that this information can properly inform management and minimize socioeconomic disruptions. AFS recommends that procedures used to collect both fishery dependent and independent data and to manage fisheries must be responsive to these environmental changes. Climate change can influence many elements that are critical to successful management. As the baseline changes, it will be increasingly important to routinely evaluate management strategies under different climate and ecosystem conditions.
  • AFS recommends active outreach by NMFS and the Councils to encourage fishermen to actively participate in data collection, assessment, and management. 
    More
    Stakeholder collected data can be vitally important in recording changes in distribution, population structure, and potentially movement rates of targeted species.

For more detailed information, please read the full report or contact Drue Winters, AFS Policy Director, at [email protected] or (301) 897-8616 x202.


Latest News about the Magnuson-Stevens Act

 

  • Modern Fish Act Signed by PresidentJanuary 7, 2019
    The Modernizing Recreational Fisheries Management Act, known as the “Modern Fish Act,” or S. 1520, passed the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives in late December and was signed by President Trump just before the end of the year.  The bill seeks to address frustration with federal management of recreational fishing, stemming from shortened or
  • AFS Experts Share MSA Recommendations with NOAA Fisheries and Key Hill StaffOctober 16, 2018
    On October 11, AFS Policy Director Drue Winters shepherded marine fisheries experts, Drs. Tom Miller and Cynthia Jones, around D.C. for robust discussions with NOAA Fisheries and Congressional staff on policy considerations for re-authorizing and amending the Magnuson-Stevens Act (MSA). Context: Over the last several years, Congress has made attempts to amend the MSA.  In
  • AFS Recommendations for Magnuson-Stevens Act Reauthorization ReleasedSeptember 18, 2018
    A new marine fisheries policy was approved by the AFS Governing Board Atlantic City in August to inform the proposed Congressional re-authorization and amendment of the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Management Act, the federal law that governs fisheries management in offshore waters. A special committee of prominent marine fisheries experts led by co-chairs, Tom Miller, University of
  • Hearing Moves Magnuson-Stevens Towards Vote in HouseJune 26, 2018
    The House Rules Committee members heard testimony on H.R. 200 on Monday, a bill that seeks to amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA).  They will take up the bill again today and it could go to the full House tomorrow for a vote. However, the House is embroiled on immigration issues which
  • Senate Commerce Committee to Consider Modern Fish ActFebruary 27, 2018
    The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation will hold an executive session on Wednesday, February 28, at 10:00 a.m. to consider S. 1520, Modernizing Recreational Fisheries Management Act of 2017 and a number of nominations. Sponsors of the Modern Fish Act include Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Deb Fisher (R-Neb.), Jim Inhofe
    • Policy News
      • Aquaculture
      • Infrastructure
      • Magnuson-Stevens Act
      • NFHP
      • Pebble Mine
      • Recovering America’s Wildlife Act
      • Water Quality
      • WOTUS
    • Policy Letters
      • Policy Letters 2006-2017
    • Recent Policy Statements
    • Archived Policy Statements
    • Climate Change
    • Future of the Nation’s Aquatic Resources
    • Magnuson-Stevens Act
    • National Fish Habitat Partnership
    • Pebble Mine
    • Recovering America’s Wildlife Act
    • Waters of the US
    • Resolutions
    • Advocacy Guidelines
    • Science Guidelines
      • Use of Best Available Science
      • Guidelines for the Use of Fishes in Research
      • Fisheries Safety Handbook
  • Recent News

    • AFS Calls for Habitat Modification to Remain in Definition of Harm in Endangered Species Act May 15, 2025
    • Webinar Recording – Great Lakes Heritage Trail May 13, 2025
    • Why Do Paddlefish Restorations Work in Some Reservoirs, But Not Others? May 9, 2025
    • Brent Nichols Elected Second Vice President of AFS May 9, 2025
    • AFS Asks House to Maintain Robust Funding for NOAA and Sea Grant May 9, 2025
  • About

    The American Fisheries Society is 501c Non-Profit Society

     

    Donate Now

    Quick Links

    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us
    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us

    Contact

    • 425 Barlow Place
      Bethesda, MD 20814
    • (301) 897-8616
    Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in Vimeo-v

    Copyright © 2025 American Fisheries Society | Privacy Policy 

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Accept Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT