Skip to content

American Fisheries Society Family of Websites:

Fisheries.org

American Fisheries Society
Family of Websites

Journals

Read our five journals and Fisheries magazine

Gray Literature Database

Find thousands of unpublished agency reports and other information

Annual Meeting

Join us in Columbus in 2026

Divisions, Chapters, Sections

Find an AFS Unit near you or in your area of specialty

Fishbook

Fisheries Collaboration Network

Climate Change and Fisheries

Learn how to communicate the effects of climate change on fisheries

Hutton Junior Fisheries Biology Program

Summer internships for high school students

Community Growth and Connections

Explore our initiatives to build community in the Society and in the fisheries profession

Center for Fisheries Technology and Collaboration

Find fisheries science products and services

Center for Technology and Collaboration

Quick answers to common questions

Other Resources
  • Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fish Website

  • Rotenone Stewardship Program Information Site

  • Fishionary: A blog about fish words! 
Latest News
2026 Officer Election Voting Now Open AFS Calls for Continued Protection of Boundary Waters from Mining Proposed Rule Would Undermine Science-based Endangered Species Act Future of Public Trust Resources – Statement of the American Fisheries Society Latest Newsletter
Donate
Login
Logout
$0.00 0 Cart
  • Who We Are

    Who We Are

    Governance

    Learn how AFS is structured

    Divisions, Sections, Chapters

    Find a community in your local
    area or in your expertise

    Committees

    Get engaged and volunteer

    Awards & Recognition

    Nominate your heroes

    Community Growth and Connections

    Learn more about our community-building efforts

    AFS Celebrates 150+ Years

    Explore our history

    AFS Fisheries Partnerships

    Meet our global partners

    Meet the Staff

    Dedicated to serving our members

    Contact Us

    Quick answers to common questions

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    What Are Fisheries?

    Explore fisheries professions

  • MEMBERSHIP

    Membership

    Learn about membership benefits and member types

    Member Directory

    Find your colleagues

    Types of Membership

    For all stages of your career

    Give the Gift
    of Membership

    Invest in an aspiring fisheries
    professional’s future

    Who Are Our Members

    From students to 50-year Golden Members

    Governance

    Learn about our organization and leadership

    My Account

    Log in to access member benefits or renew

    Join/Renew

    It’s Quick and Easy

    Organizational Membership

    Become a Strategic Partner!

  • POLICY

    POLICY

    Recovering America’s
    Wildlife Act

    Critical funding for state conservation programs

    Climate Change

    Communicate the impacts
    of climate change on fisheries

    Magnuson-Stevens Act

    Ensuring sustainability of marine fisheries

    Waters of the US

    News about Clean Water Act
    jurisdiction

    Water Quality

    Healthy fisheries require healthy waters

    Pebble Mine

    Protecting Bristol Bay salmon fisheries

    National Fish
    Habitat Partnership

    Addressing fish habitat regionally

    Infrastructure

    Funding impacts on fish habitat

    Aquaculture

    Providing food security for the future

    Future of the Nation’s
    Aquatic Resources

    Priorities for US fisheries policies

    Recent Policy Statements

    Official policy statements of AFS

    Policy Letters

    Comments on policy,
    legislation, and regulations

    Sport Fish Restoration Act

    Understanding its importance in funding state agency fisheries management

    Advocacy Guidelines

    For Units and members

    Science Guidelines

    Practicing science appropriately

    Briefings

    Congressional briefings with our partners

    Resolutions

    Member-approved resolutions
    on policy

  • NEWS

    News

    Announcements

    Official AFS news

    Annual Meeting

    News from the meeting

    Members in the News

    Awards and interviews

    Policy News

    Round-up of all policy news

    Beneath the Surface Podcast

    A deep dive into the programs and people at AFS

    Federal Workforce and Budget Cuts

    Resources and Ways to Take Action

    Newsletter

    Bi-weekly newsletter for members and partners

    Press Releases

    News media releases

  • EVENTS

    Events

    Annual Meeting

    Columbus 2026

    Future Annual Meetings

    Where we are heading

    Past Annual Meetings

    Where we’ve been

    World Fisheries Congress 2024

    Seattle, Washington

    Other Past Events

    Past special events

    Fisheries Events Calendar

    Events around the world

    Add Your Event Listing

    Submit your calendar item

  • JOBS

    Jobs

    Career Help from AFS

    Compilation of job listing boards

    Other Career Tips

    Career info for members

    Find a Job

    Listings from all over North America

    Post a Job

    Submit your job opening

  • PUBLICATIONS

    Publications

    AFS Journals Program

    More than 150 years of excellence

    AFS Books Program

    Publish with AFS

    Submit Journal Article

    Reach the right audience for your research

    Fisheries Magazine

    Monthly membership magazine

    Writing Tools

    Guides for authors and other resources

    Fishy Fridays

    Weekly blog highlighting AFS fisheries journal articles

    Bookstore

    Shop more than 180 titles

    Journal Online Access

    Log in to access journal articles

    Gray Literature Database

    Thousands of unpublished agency reports and research

  • Professional Development

    Professional Development

    Continuing Education

    Gain skills and enhance your career

    Professional Certification

    Official recognition of your expertise

    Hutton Junior Fisheries
    Biology Program

    Summer high school
    internship program

    Leadership Opportunities

    Hone your leadership skills, volunteer today!

    Training Opportunities Calendar

    Webinars, online courses, on-site workshops, and field training

    Webinars

    Check out upcoming sessions or browse our library

    More Online Resources

    Practical resources for fisheries professionals

  • Engagement

    Engagement

    Strategic Partners

    See how your organization can partner with AFS

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    The 1870 Society

    Recognizing generous individual donors who invest in the Society's mission

    2024 Annual Report

    Find out what AFS did for the fisheries community in 2024

    Shop AFS

    Check out the latest AFS merch here

Login
Logout

Marine and Coastal Fisheries Special Section: Spatial Analysis, Mapping, and Marine Fisheries Management

  • June 8, 2016
  • Fisheries News & Science, News
  • Home
  • Marine and Coastal Fisheries Special Section: Spatial Analysis, Mapping, and Marine Fisheries Management

Special Section Introduction

credit: NOAA
Photo credit: NOAA

by Peter Rubec

The Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1996 mandated that the National Marine Fisheries Service develop guidelines to assist fisheries management councils nationwide in the creation of essential fish habitat (EFH) regulations (NMFS 1996). The amended act (Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006) required regional fishery management councils to set annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AM) by 2011 for all managed species to ensure that overfishing would not occur. It also required that the councils create fisheries ecosystem plans to better relate fishery species to their supporting ecosystems through ecosystem-based fisheries management. Unfortunately, due to limitations on funding, resources, and available data, it is difficult to fully implement these requirements.

Most of the marine fisheries data used to support stock assessments and management are collected by fisheries-dependent monitoring (FDM) when the fish are landed. The fishermen report their catches from large statistical zones as either catch per day or catch per trip. In most cases, no associated environmental, habitat, or geographically specific fishing location data are reported. An alternative is to collect georeferenced catch, effort, and environmental data at sea using government-sponsored fishery-independent monitoring (FIM). But FIM surveys are expensive and funding is becoming more difficult to obtain.

While it is obvious to most anglers and commercial fishermen that estuarine and marine species occupy various habitats throughout their life histories, single-species stock assessment models often do not include georeferenced catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) and associated environmental data. Part of the problem has been that better analytical tools were needed to quantify fish–habitat relationships. Fortunately, there have been large improvements in GIS software, models, statistical approaches, and computing capabilities.

The papers presented in this special section demonstrate recent developments in modeling and mapping to better support the spatial management of marine fisheries.

Bryan et al. (2016) describe the feasibility of a regionwide FIM probability survey of coral reef fishes in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Four years of underwater visual survey data were collected and used in conjunction with detailed bathymetric maps and bottom habitat maps to develop a probability sampling design. Stratification by depth and habitat produced a more efficient survey design for estimating fish density. These authors found that controlling survey precision over a region required less sampling effort than controlling precision for smaller areas within the larger survey frame. The regional sampling design thus allowed more cost-effective surveys with higher precision. The article shows the importance of defining management objectives prior to the development of FIM surveys.

Harford et al. (2016) studied cross-shelf occupancy probabilities for juvenile groupers in the Florida Keys. A FIM-based diver visual survey was used to quantify the occupancy patterns of Black Grouper Mycteroperca bonaci and Red Grouper Epinephelus morio below minimum size limits. Logistic regression and site occupancy models were used to quantify predicted occurrence probability with respect to latitude and across depth and vertical relief gradients. Multilevel models revealed variance structures of fish distributions not revealed by fixed-effects models. Both grouper species demonstrated occurrence responses that varied with the regional topographic features of the reef tract.

Rubec et el. (2016b) collected georeferenced FDM catch, effort, and environmental data on commercial shrimp fishing vessels on the West Florida Shelf (WFS) using an electronic logbook and a wireless data logger. Interpolated habitat grids were derived from circulation modeling, benthic mapping, and other data. The CPUE of pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum was related to bottom temperature, bottom current direction, current speed, bottom type, depth, aspect, and vessel monitoring system (VMS) zone. Upwelling onto the WFS occurred from June to December 2004 and downwelling from January to June 2005. A seven-factor habitat suitability model was used to generate distribution maps of adult pink shrimp CPUE monthly for 16 months. Significantly greater mean CPUEs during 2004 occurred in optimum zones, which were associated with upwelling bottom currents of 3 cm/s originating from the northwest. A VMS map depicting zones of high fishing activity was associated with trawlable bottom, while zones of low fishing activity were related to the distribution of hard bottom or mixed hard bottom. The maps produced during the study can support the delineation of EFH and habitat areas of particular concern for pink shrimp on the WFS.

Farmer et al. (2016b) note that although the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (GMFMC) managed 42 finfish stocks under the Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan, stock assessments only existed for 10 species. One approach for data-limited species would be to group them into stock complexes with a single ACL. This was evaluated using both FDM and FIM data from the Gulf of Mexico. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed several consistent assemblages among reef fish species. The study also considered the geographic and depth distribution of each species, life history characteristics, and exploitation patterns and vulnerabilities. Maps were produced depicting the spatial distributions of six shallow-water snapper species, six midwater snapper/triggerfish species, and four species of jacks. The clustering of shallow-water snappers was reasonably tight. Clustering the rare snapper species was done primarily through nodal analysis and the use of a weighted mean cluster association index. The results were used to provide guidance to the GMFMC in setting ACLs for stocks and stock complexes in their 2011 Comprehensive ACL/AM Amendment.

Farmer et al. (2016a) evaluated alternatives to a winter closure of pot gear in relation to projected impacts on the catch of Black Sea Bass Centropristis striata and the relative risk of entanglement for North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis. Different spatial and temporal area closures were evaluated in relation to ACLs using overlays of seasonal Black Sea Bass pot gear effort models (based on captains’ logbooks) and North Atlantic right whale population distribution models (based on sightings per unit effort data). The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council considered 12 alternatives. The preferred alternative was projected to result in a relatively low risk of entanglement for North Atlantic right whales off North Carolina, South Carolina, and the east coast of Florida. This framework demonstrates the use of temporally dynamic spatial overlays in assessing the impacts of time–area closures with multiple objectives.

Froeschke and Froeschke (2016) developed a two-stage boosted regression tree (delta-BRT) model to characterize the distribution of Southern Flounder Paralichthys lethostigma in Texas estuaries at varying population sizes. Gill-net data collected by FIM sampling from 1977 to 2012 were analyzed using a model of this type to correlate distribution with environmental conditions and seasonal or long-term changes in abundance. Depth, temperature, distance from tidal inlets, and salinity were the primary environmental factors used to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of Southern Flounder. Models were fit using cross validation and variance was estimated using nonparametric bootstrapping. The mapped results showed a coastwide decline in abundance from 1980–1984 to 2005–2009, but the magnitude of the decline varied across the study area, suggesting that there were disproportionate changes in abundance. The greatest declines were observed in the southernmost estuaries (upper and lower Laguna Madre). Notable declines were also evident in Baffin Bay during the October and November spawning period. South Texas estuaries support the greatest proportion of age-2 and older Southern Flounder, and this was the most variable region when periods of historically high and low abundance were compared. Analytical tools such as delta-BRT are now available to support the spatial management of marine–estuarine species.

Rubec et al. (2016a) developed spatial models for 87 species life stages in Tampa Bay capable of dealing with FIM sampling data with an excess of zero catches. An analysis of juvenile pink shrimp summer data is presented as an example of the methods applied. Environmental data gathered from 1998 to 2008 were interpolated to produce seasonal habitat grids for temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen and annual grids for depth and bottom type. Seasonal habitat suitability models were developed using the gamlss package in R. The full model selected either a delta-gamma generalized additive model (GAM) or a delta-beta GAM. The best reduced model was identified based on the lowest Akaike information criterion. The predicted CPUE grid (number/m2) created can be used to estimate population numbers either across the estuary or within selected areas. The modeling approach is statistically rigorous and can support fisheries management through the delineation of EFH or habitat areas of particular concern and the creation of fisheries ecosystem plans in support of ecosystem-based fisheries management. It also can be used to support oil spill response and natural resource damage assessment. The population estimates could be used to support setting ACLs.

References

  • 1. Bryan, D. R., S. G. Smith, J. S. Ault, M. W. Feeley, and C. W. Menza. 2016. Feasibility of a regionwide probability survey for coral reef fish in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:135–146. [Taylor & Francis Online]
  • 2. Farmer, N. A., T. A. Gowan, J. R. Powell, and B. J. Zoodsma. 2016a. Evaluation of alternatives to winter closure of Black Sea Bass pot gear: projected impacts on catch and risk of entanglement with North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:202–221.
  • 3. Farmer, N. A., R. P. Malinowski, M. F. McGovern, and P. J. Rubec. 2016b. Stock complexes for fisheries management in the Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:177–201. [Taylor & Francis Online]
  • 4. Froeschke, J. T., and B. F. Froeschke. 2016. Two-stage boosted regression tree model to characterize Southern Flounder distribution in Texas estuaries at varying population sizes. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:222–231.
  • 5. Harford, W. J., S. G. Smith, J. S. Ault, and E. A. Babcock. 2016. Cross-shelf habitat occupancy probabilities for juvenile groupers in the Florida Keys coral reef ecosystem. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:147–159.
  • 6. Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act of 2006. U.S. Statutes at Large 120:3575–3663.
  • 7. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1996. Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act as amended through October 11, 1996. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-23.
  • 8. Rubec, P. J., R. Kiltie, E. Leone, R. O. Flamm, L. McEachron, and C. Santi. 2016a. Using delta-generalized additive models to predict spatial distributions and population abundance of juvenile pink shrimp in Tampa Bay, Florida. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:232–243.
  • 9. Rubec, P. J., J. Lewis, D. Reed, C. Santi, R. H. Weisberg, L. Zheng, C. Jenkins, C. F. Ashbaugh, C. Lashley, and S. Versaggi 2016b. Linking oceanographic modeling and benthic mapping with habitat suitability models for pink shrimp on the West Florida Shelf. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 8:160–176. [Taylor & Francis Online]
  • Recent News

    • AFS Urges Modernization of Sporting Goods Excise Tax that Funds Fisheries Conservation May 13, 2026
    • Is Bigger Better for Hatchery Chinook Salmon? May 1, 2026
    • Webinar: A Perpetual Franchise to Cultivate Oysters April 30, 2026
    • Webinar: Skin Cancer Risk and Outdoor Workers: Early Detection and Sun Protection Could Save Your Life April 30, 2026
    • AFS Calls for Robust Funding for NOAA Fisheries April 27, 2026
  • About

    The American Fisheries Society is 501c Non-Profit Society

     

    Donate Now

    Quick Links

    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us
    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us

    Contact

    • 25 Century Boulevard
      Suite 505
      Nashville, TN 37214
    • (301) 897-8616
    Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in Vimeo-v

    Copyright © 2026 American Fisheries Society | Privacy Policy 

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Accept Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT