The Steven Berkeley Marine Conservation Fellowship was established in 2007 to honor the memory of Steve Berkeley, a dedicated fisheries scientist with a passionate interest in integrating the fields of marine ecology, conservation biology, and fisheries science to improve fisheries management. Through this fellowship, Steve’s legacy lives on by supporting graduate student research in marine conservation. As we announce the Berkeley fellowship recipients and present the future calls for applications for the fellowship, we revisit Steve’s life and also get updates from previous fellows on how the award impacted their research and careers.
Steven Berkeley’s Marine Conservation Legacy Lives On
By Susan Sogard Steve was born and raised in Queens, New York. As a city kid, he was embedded in the rich cultural world of New York City and loved classical music and opera. He became an accomplished musician himself, primarily on the bassoon, and later played professionally with the Miami Philharmonic Orchestra. Although his parents’ lives revolved around art and music, they also loved fishing. Steve’s lifelong passion for fish and fishing was launched by his early experiences catching cod and fluke on party boats off Long Island. He fished at every possible location and at every opportunity and was delighted with every successful catch, from tiny trout in alpine lakes to giant tuna in offshore seas. In later years, as his conservation consciousness prevailed, most of those fish were released unharmed. Steve began his career in academia, as a research scientist at the University of Miami. He worked on a range of subjects and species, including ichthyoplankton ecology; population dynamics of clupeids, halfbeaks, and Swordfish; and fisheries management aspects of penaeid shrimp. He then moved to Charleston, South Carolina, to work directly in the management arena as a staff biologist with the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, where he developed management plans for Swordfish, billfish, and sharks and participated on numerous international scientific and management panels for these species. In 1993, he returned to academia as a research scientist, first at Oregon State University and later at the University of California in Santa Cruz. His research interests on the West Coast focused on ecology and life history of long-lived species, in particular rockfish and Sablefish. He was deeply concerned with the evidence of continuing age truncation in heavily fished species, a pattern that clearly countered the bet-hedging advantages of a long life span. His research on maternal effects in rockfish demonstrated the importance of maintaining large, old females in a population and validated, for rockfish, the importance of marine reserves as the most viable management approach to protect age diversity in long-lived fishes. As an avid fisherman himself, Steve focused not on shutting down fisheries but on determining ways to ensure continued production and accessibility to commercial fishers. Throughout his career, he worked closely with fishermen around the country, gaining their respect and listening carefully to their suggestions for improving fishing practices. He fished commercially for Swordfish and sharks in Miami and later involved Swordfish captains in research projects. On the West Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico, he collaborated with numerous commercial fishermen on one of his ongoing interests, reducing bycatch. These projects involved both basic ecological studies of life history and behavior in an effort to reduce where and when fish are vulnerable to capture as well as practical development of gear modifications. Steve effectively melded research with management applications throughout his career. Some of his key advisory service included the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, the Scientific and Statistical Committees of both the North Pacific and Pacific fishery management councils, and panels addressing marine ecosystem-based management and integration of marine protected areas with fisheries management. Reflecting his concerns with declining fish populations, he worked closely with several nongovernmental organizations in later years, providing both advice and review of fisheries-related programs. He was one of the few people I know who was equally comfortable in the sometimes divergent arenas of university research, commercial fishing, fisheries management, and conservation groups. I believe that this reflected his genuine interest in having these groups work together toward common goals.