Skip to content

American Fisheries Society Family of Websites:

Fisheries.org

American Fisheries Society
Family of Websites

Journals

Read our five journals and Fisheries magazine

Gray Literature Database

Find thousands of unpublished agency reports and other information

Annual Meeting

Join us in San Antonio in 2025

Divisions, Chapters, Sections

Find an AFS Unit near you or in your area of specialty

Climate Change and Fisheries

Learn how to communicate the effects of climate change on fisheries

Hutton Junior Fisheries Biology Program

Summer internships for high school students

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Fisheries

Explore our initiatives to increase diversity in the Society and in the fisheries profession

Center for Fisheries Technology and Collaboration

Find fisheries science products and services

Center for Technology and Collaboration

Quick answers to common questions

Other Resources
  • Standard Methods for Sampling North American Freshwater Fish Website

  • Rotenone Stewardship Program Information Site

  • Fishionary: A blog about fish words! 
Latest News
AFS Calls for Habitat Modification to Remain in Definition of Harm in Endangered Species Act Natural Resource Professional Societies Issue Joint Statement on the Impacts of Federal Workforce Reduction Future of Public Trust Resources – Statement of the American Fisheries Society AFS x CWP – ‘Tomorrow’s Catch: Securing our Future Fisheries’   Latest Newsletter
Donate
Login
Logout
$0.00 0 Cart
  • Who We Are

    Who We Are

    Governance

    Learn how AFS is structured

    Divisions, Sections, Chapters

    Find a community in your local
    area or in your expertise

    Committees

    Get engaged and volunteer

    Awards & Recognition

    Nominate your heroes

    Diversity

    Learn more about our DEIJA efforts

    AFS Celebrates 150+ Years

    Explore our history

    AFS Fisheries Partnerships

    Meet our global partners

    Meet the Staff

    Dedicated to serving our members

    Contact Us

    Quick answers to common questions

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    What Are Fisheries?

    Explore fisheries professions

  • MEMBERSHIP

    Membership

    Learn about membership benefits and member types

    Member Directory

    Find your colleagues

    Types of Membership

    For all stages of your career                   

    Give the Gift
    of Membership

    Invest in an aspiring fisheries
    professional’s future

    Who Are Our Members

    From students to 50-year Golden Members

    My Account

    Log in to access member benefits or renew

    Join/Renew

    It’s Quick and Easy

    Organizational Membership

    Become a Strategic Partner!

  • POLICY

    POLICY

    Recovering America’s
    Wildlife Act

    Critical funding for state conservation programs

    Climate Change

    Communicate the impacts
    of climate change on fisheries

    Magnuson-Stevens Act

    Ensuring sustainability of marine fisheries

    Waters of the US

    News about Clean Water Act
    jurisdiction

    Water Quality

    Healthy fisheries
    require healthy waters                    

    Pebble Mine

    Protecting Bristol Bay salmon fisheries

    National Fish
    Habitat Partnership

    Addressing fish habitat regionally

    Infrastructure

    Funding impacts on fish habitat

    Aquaculture

    Providing food security for the future

    Future of the Nation’s
    Aquatic Resources

    Priorities for US fisheries policies

    Sport Fish Restoration Act

    Coming soon

    Recent Policy Statements

    Official policy statements of AFS

    Policy Letters

    Comments on policy,
    legislation, and regulations

    Advocacy Guidelines

    For Units and members

    Science Guidelines

    Practicing science appropriately

    Briefings

    Congressional briefings with our partners

    Resolutions

    Member-approved resolutions
    on policy

  • NEWS

    News

    Announcements

    Official AFS news

    Annual Meeting

    News from the meeting

    Members in the News

    Awards and interviews

    Policy News

    Round-up of all policy news

    Beneath the Surface Podcast

    A deep dive into the programs and people at AFS

    Federal Workforce and Budget Cuts

    Resources and Ways to Take Action

    Newsletter

    Bi-weekly newsletter for members and partners

    Press Releases

    News media releases

  • EVENTS

    Events

    Annual Meeting

    San Antonio 2025

    Future Annual Meetings

    Where we are heading

    Past Annual Meetings

    Where we’ve been

    World Fisheries Congress 2024

    Seattle, Washington

    Other Past Events

    Past special events

    Fisheries Events Calendar

    Events around the world

    Add Your Event Listing

    Submit your calendar item

  • JOBS

    Jobs

    Career Help from AFS

    Compilation of job listing boards

    Other Career Tips

    Career info for members

    Find a Job

    Listings from all over North America

    Post a Job

    Submit your job opening

  • PUBLICATIONS

    Publications

    AFS Journals Program

    More than 150 years of excellence

    AFS Books Program

    Publish with AFS

    Submit Journal Article

    Reach the right audience for your research

    Fisheries Magazine

    Monthly membership magazine

    Writing Tools

    Guides for authors and other resources

    Fishy Fridays

    Weekly blog highlighting AFS fisheries journal articles

    Bookstore

    Shop more than 180 titles

    Journal Online Access

    Log in to access journal articles

    Gray Literature Database

    Thousands of unpublished agency reports and research

  • Professional Development

    Professional Development

    Continuing Education

    Gain skills and enhance your career

    Professional Certification

    Official recognition of your expertise

    Hutton Junior Fisheries
    Biology Program

    Summer high school
    internship program

    Leadership Opportunities

    Hone your leadership skills, volunteer today!

    Webinars

    Check out upcoming sessions or browse our library

    More Online Resources

    Practical resources for fisheries professionals

  • Engagement

    Engagement

    Strategic Partners

    See how your organization can partner with AFS

    Support AFS

    Discover how you can support critical AFS programs

    The 1870 Society

    Recognizing generous individual donors who invest in the Society's mission

    2024 Annual Report

    Find out what AFS did for the fisheries community in 2024

    Shop AFS

    Check out the latest AFS merch here

Login
Logout

Introductions of Aquatic Species

AFS-Policy-Review-Updates

American Fisheries Society Position on Introductions of Aquatic Species

Click to download a printable copies of the PDF or DOC:
• AFS Policy Statement #15 (DOC)
• AFS Policy Statement #15 (PDF)

A.  Issue Definition

The increased frequency of inter- and intranational transfers of aquatic species carried out over the last 2 decades has prompted concern relative to the potential for debasement of integrity of aquatic communities. Past introductions, intentional or otherwise, have run the full gamut from spectacular booms (e.g., Pacific salmon to the Great Lakes) to spectacular busts (e.g., the waterweed hydrilla to portions of the United States). Considering the manifestations of such extremes in terms of ecological and economical impacts, it is not surprising that opposing viewpoints exist with respect to the relative pros and cons of effectuating introductions of aquatic species. Nevertheless, natural resource managers concur that substantially improved measures can and should be taken to increase the odds that benefits of a given introduction will exceed risks. Currently, a number of international commissions have adopted or are considering adopting formal “codes of practice” for regulating the introduction of aquatic species (see Sindermann 1986; Welcome 1986; Kohler and Courtenay 1986). Implementation of such codes (protocols, guidelines, etc.) can ensure that decisions regarding future introductions are based on sound ecological evidence, and that introductions effectuated are properly evaluated.

B.  Negative Impacts on Aquatic Communities

The impacts of introduced aquatic organisms on native aquatic communities in North America have been summarized by Contreras and Escalante (1984) for Mexico, by Taylor et al. (1984) for the continental United States, and by Crossman (1984) for Canada. These impacts can be classified into five broad categories: habitat alteration, trophic alteration, spatial alteration, gene pool deterioration, and introduction of diseases.

Habitat Alteration

Introduced plants such as water hyacinth (see Table 1 for scientific names of organisms cited in text), Eurasian was termilfoil, alligator weed, and hydrilla have seriously infested a number of water bodies in North America (Shireman 1984). Excessive vegetation interferes with swimming and fishing activities, upsets predator-prey relationships by providing too much cover, causes water quality problems during growth and decomposition, and is aesthetically unpleasing (Noble 1980). Ironically, exotic fishes, particularly grass carp and the tilapias, are frequently used as biological controls. Both the grass carp and the tilapias have reproducing populations in North America, although the habitat requirement for larval grass carp has so far proved to be limiting and the tilapias are basically limited to the southern extreme of the United States and to Mexico.

Although grass carp have proven to be an excellent bio logical control for aquatic vegetation, a risk exists that aquatic plants (including native forms) might become overly decimated as a result of grass carp predation which in turn would limit nursery areas for juvenile fishes, cause bank erosion, and accelerate eutrophication through release of nutrients previously stored in the plants. A risk also exists that grass carp could adversely impact waterfowl habitat and rice fields. However, no major adverse impacts associated with grass carp have yet been documented.

Although common carp was not introduced to North America for aquatic weed control, its foraging behavior results in vegetation removal both by direct consumption and by uprooting due to its proclivity to dig through substrate in search of food. The latter activity also results in increased water turbidity. The common carp is the most often cited nuisance introduced fish in North America (Kohler and Stanley 1984) with millions of dollars having been spent for control and eradication, but with little success (Laycock 1966; Courtenay and Robins 1973).

Besides grass carp, only the redbelly tilapia has been widely used in weed control programs in North America. No effects on native communities have yet been attributed to vegetation removal by any of the tilapias (Taylor et al. 1984), though increases in turbidity have been attributed to digging activities of the blue tilapia (Noble et al. 1975) and to organic enrichment through fecal decomposition by redbelly tilapia (Hickling 1961; Phillippy 1969).

Trophic Alteration

Taylor et al. (1984) speculated that the introduction of any species into a novel environment should alter community trophic structure, with the nature and extent of such changes being complex and unpredictable. Though this aspect is not well documented, there is little doubt that when an introduced fish exhibits explosive population increases, as has occurred with the tilapias (Germany 1977; Knaggs 1977; Shafland 1979), substantial changes in native communities must occur. Likewise, several dozen studies have documented dietary overlap between introduced and native fishes (see Taylor et al. 1984). However, these studies only demonstrate that the potential for competition exists. Linking dietary overlap to competition has proven to be a difficult task for all but the most controlled ecological studies regardless of whether non-native species are involved.

Documentation of predation by introduced species on native species serves as the most definitive example of impacts on communities. The most frequently cited example in North America concerns declines in populations of native trouts attributable to brown trout predation (see Moyle 1976a,b; Sharpe 1962; Alexander 1977, 1979). Several other introduced fishes have been implicated as major causes of mortality among native fishes, including pike killifish (Miley 1978; Turner 1981; Anderson 1981, 1982), oscar (Hogg 1976), and the bairdiella (Quast 1961). Though frequently cited as a potential threat of considerable consequence, predation on eggs or young by introduced fishes has not been demonstrated to be a common occurrence (Taylor et al. 1984).

Spatial Alteration

Concommittant overlap in usage of space by non-native and native fishes may lead to competitive interaction if space is in limited supply or of variable quality. Evidence exists implicating displacement of brook trout by brown trout, but in general, displacements are largely inferential (Taylor et al. 1984). Conversely, high densities of introduced fishes have been shown to exert negative effects on native fishes. For example, Noble et al. (1975) observed that largemouth bass populations in Trinidad Lake, Texas, declined with no evidence of recruitment as densities of blue tilapia rose to approximately 2,240 kg ha~’ during the period 1972-1975.

Gene Pool Deterioration

Though reduction of heterogeneity through inbreeding is clearly a threat to any species being produced in a hatchery (Philipp et al. 1983), the risk is most acute with species of intercontinental origin because the initial broodstock invariably represent limited gene pools at the outset. The larger the stocking program, the more inbreeding among original broodstock is necessary. Thus species introduced to a novel habitat may or may not have the genetic characteristics necessary for them to adapt and/or perform as predicted.

Fortunately, hybridization events among introduced and native species in open waters are rare (Taylor et al. 1984). Nevertheless, the possibility of native gene pools being altered through such hybridization does exist. For example, brown trout are known to hybridize with native forms in North America (Schwartz 1972, 1981; Dangel et al. 1973; Chevassus 1979).

Introduction of Diseases

Diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, and parasites are all too often conveyed along with introduced aquatic species (see Hoffman and Schubert 1984; Shotts and Gratzek 1984 for reviews). This aspect represents one of the most severe threats that an introduced species may pose to a native community. Transfer of diseased fish was no doubt responsible for introduction of whirling~ disease into North America from Europe. Recently, infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) has been spread to a number of countries in conjunction with shipments of live penaeid shrimp. IHHNV was first diagnosed in 1981 at shrimp culture facilities in Hawaii among shrimp introduced from Panama (Sindermann 1986). Even “ich,” one of the most common fish diseases worldwide, caused by a ciliated protozoan, is thought to have been transferred from Asia throughout the temperate zone with shipments of fishes (Hoffman 1970, 1981).

C.  Courses of Action

Introductions of species to aquatic communities are commonly employed as a fisheries management tool or occur as a result of escapes from aquaculture or ornamental fish holding facilities. It is not feasible, nor desirable, to legislate against all such introductions. What is needed is more education on the role that introduced species can and should play in the context of aquatic resources management. The more informed natural resources managers are about such issues, the less likely that mistakes will be made or that legislation will be necessary to enforce an “attitude of caution.” The following actions toward that end are recommended.

  1. The membership reaffirms its endorsement of the 1972 “Position of the American Fisheries Society on Introductions of Exotic Aquatic Species” with modifications as indicated:

Position of American Fisheries Society on Introductions of `Introduced’ Aquatic Species:

Our purpose is to formulate a broad mechanism for planning, regulating, implementing, and monitoring all introductions of aquatic species.

Some introductions of species into ecosystems in which they are not native have been successful (e.g., coho salmon and striped bass) and others unfortunate (e.g., common carp and walking catfish).

Species not native to an ecosystem will be termed “introduced.” Some introductions are in some sense, planned and purposeful for management reasons; others are accidental or are simply ways of disposing of unwanted pets or research organisms.

It is recommended that the policy of the American Fisheries Society be:

  1. Encourage fish importers, farmers, dealers, and hobbyists to prevent and discourage the accidental or purposeful introduction of aquatic into their local ecosystems.
  1. Urge that no city, county, state, province, or federal agency introduce, or allow to be introduced, any exotic species into any waters within its jurisdiction which might contaminate any waters outside its jurisdiction without official sanction of the exposed jurisdictions.
  1. Urge that only ornamental aquarium fish dealers be permitted to import such fishes for sale or distribution to hobbyist The “dealer” would be defined as a firm or per son whose income derives from live ornamental aquarium fishes.
  1. Urge that the importation of e*e~e fishes for purposes of research not involving introduction into a natural ecosystem, or for display in public aquaria by individuals or organizations, be made under agreement with responsible governmental agencies. Such importers will be subject to investigatory procedures currently existing and/or to be developed, and species so imported shall be kept under conditions preventing escape or accidental introduction. Aquarium hobbyists should be encouraged to import rare ornamental fishes through such importers. No fishes shall be released into any natural ecosystem upon termination of research or display.
  1. Urge that all species of exotics considered for release be prohibited and considered undesirable for any purposes of introduction into any ecosystem unless that ~sh species shall have been evaluated upon the following bases and found to be desirable:
  1. RATIONALE. Reasons for seeking an import should be clearly stated and demonstrate It should be clearly noted what qualities are sought that would make the import more desirable than native forms.
  2. SEARCH: Within the qualifications set forth under RATIONALE, a search of possible contenders should be made, with a list prepared of those that appear most likely to succeed, and the favorable and unfavorable aspects of each species noted.
  3. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT. This should go beyond the area of rationale to consider impact on target aquatic ecosystems, general~ effect on game and food fishes or waterfowl, on aquatic plants and public health. The published information on the species should be reviewed and the species should be studied in preliminary fashion in its biotope.
  4. PUBLICITY AND REVIEW. The subject should be entirely open and expert advice should be sought. It is at this point that thoroughness is in order. No importation is so urgent that it should not be subject to careful evaluation.
  5. EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH: If a prospective import passes the first four steps, a research program should be initiated by an appropriate agency or organization to test the import in confined waters (experimental ponds, etc.).
  6. EVALUATION OR RECOMMENDATION: Again publicity is in order and complete reports should be circulated amongst interested scientists and presented for publication in the Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.
  7. INTRODUCTION: With favorable evaluation, the re lease should be effected and monitored, with results published or circulated.
  1. Because animals do not respect political boundaries, it would seem that an international, national, and regional agency should either be involved at the starter and have the veto power at the end. Under this procedure there is no doubt that fewer introductions would be accomplished, but quality and not quantity is desired and many mistakes might be avoided.
  2. The Society encourages international, national, and regional natural resource agencies to endorse and follow the intent of the above position.
  3. The Society encourages international harmonization of guidelines, protocols, codes of practice, etc., as they apply to introductions of aquatic species.
  4. Fisheries professionals and other aquatic specialists are urged to become more aware of issues relating to introduced species.

Click to download a printable copies of the PDF or DOC:
• AFS Policy Statement #15 (DOC)
• AFS Policy Statement #15 (PDF)

  • Recent News

    • AFS Calls for Habitat Modification to Remain in Definition of Harm in Endangered Species Act May 15, 2025
    • Webinar Recording – Great Lakes Heritage Trail May 13, 2025
    • Why Do Paddlefish Restorations Work in Some Reservoirs, But Not Others? May 9, 2025
    • Brent Nichols Elected Second Vice President of AFS May 9, 2025
    • AFS Asks House to Maintain Robust Funding for NOAA and Sea Grant May 9, 2025
  • About

    The American Fisheries Society is 501c Non-Profit Society

     

    Donate Now

    Quick Links

    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us
    • ABOUT
    • POLICY
    • EVENTS
    • PUBLICATIONS
    • MEMBERSHIP
    • NEWS
    • JOBS
    • Contact Us

    Contact

    • 425 Barlow Place
      Bethesda, MD 20814
    • (301) 897-8616
    Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in Vimeo-v

    Copyright © 2025 American Fisheries Society | Privacy Policy 

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Accept Read More
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    SAVE & ACCEPT